Sunday, July 6, 2014

U-NEEKs: Uniquely crafted and loved, just like each of our darlings

Obviously, our family is unique, so when I heard about the U-NEEK line from Dayspring of toys, apps, and gifts for children, my curiosity was piqued. Even more so when I saw the tag line from Psalm 139: "fearfully and wonderfully made."


Jocelyn and Patience have Jazz and AllieBird, who are purported to be best buds respectively with Robbie's Indigo and Philip's Mustachio, according to their tags. (Mustachio's tag also offers the nickname of Bubba, which rolls off Philip's lips more comfortably, so that's what his green guy goes by.)


Patu has Dweeber, and anyone who knows us in person needs to ask her to say Dweeber. Seriously.
Because three year old pronunciations are awesome, and because laughter is good for the soul.

Zoe has Splat. She only has about 40-50 words she uses regularly, and one of them? "Plat." Heaven help the person who tries to play with Splat! This weekend's "NO!" and "bad Patu!" from Zoe were the result of that sort of attempt from her sister.

Each stuffed U-NEEK is only slightly larger than a Beanie Baby or Beanie Boo, making them handy to bring on a roadtrip or tuck into bed with a sleepy little one. Our little ones didn't care much for the tags, but Jocelyn and Patience are obsessed with knowing the backstories for each of our little Dayspring friends. That curiosity includes an insistence on learning each U-NEEK's Bible verse, which makes for 6 newly memorized verses for the girls - a huge win in hiding God's word in their hearts, don't you think?




I didn't let them bring their U-NEEKs in, but last week's trip to the aquarium and the beach included comfy, cozy companionship in each child's car seat, showing our kids' unique love for each of their fluffy friends.

As for my take on them, the only downside is that the girls' notebooks show that we're missing two of the U-NEEK collection, so I hear, "When are we going to get Wally and Trysta May?" every so often.

Hmm, maybe I have some chore completion incentives here... 

Sure, these are simple stuffed animals, but my precious ones love them and - at only about $9 a toy - they're a cheap investment to turn little hearts toward God's word and the truth that each child is uniquely, fearfully, and wonderfully made.

From now until July 14, U-NEEKs are available at Wal-Mart and Hobby Lobby, so you don't have to take my word for it - go check them out in person yourself. And maybe I'm the only crazy one who is already thinking of Christmas, but I'm picturing U-NEEK creatures as perfect stocking stuffers.

This post was sponsored by Dayspring with $50 of U-NEEK merchandise provided to us, but my opinions as well as the pure child-like joy from our six are all our own.

Thursday, June 26, 2014

"horribly devastating?" no.
a life worthy of love.

We're coming up on the two year anniversary of our trip to Taiwan to meet Zoe and finalize her adoption and return to the US to join with Robbie and Jocelyn as a family of five.

Expect loads of "two years ago today" posts on Facebook and Twitter, thanks to my addiction to TimeHop.

What I've been reflecting on lately, though, isn't what happened two years ago but how much God has used Zoe's arrival in our family to shape me and Lee. I don't talk about this part of her story much, but her records from Taiwan were pretty hopeless looking. Upon reviewing her MRIs and medical reports from Taitung, several prominent neurologists around the country agreed that she had little potential to move, think, or communicate like a typical person. Why so many doctors looking at her file and weighing in? Each one did so for different families who each subsequently passed on the opportunity to adopt the baby girl called "Jesse" back then. The last doctor to review her medical information recommended against her adoption, saying she would be "horribly devastating" given how extensive her brain abnormalities were and how all-encompassing her cerebral palsy would be.

Yes, that little girl in the middle right there:

I'm flooded with adjectives and emotions to describe her, but "horribly devastating" is not one.
Not even close.

Many of you know this story already, but it bears telling again. On the eve of Jocelyn's fifth birthday, a friend sent me a Facebook message. She knew we planned to adopt a child with special needs someday, and she tripped over her words a bit as she shared about a baby girl in Taiwan whose future was unpredictable and who needed a family. We said we'd pray about it, not because we intended to pray about it but because we thought that was the church-y answer to give instead of saying no right away. It was a Saturday night, and we planned to reply on Tuesday with a list of reasons why we weren't her family. "We'll pray about it" was merely a stall technique and not an honest answer.

Then on Sunday or Monday night, Lee rolled over to me in bed and said, "Maybe we should actually pray about it, because we said we would." He quickly followed with, "I mean, I know the answer, but..."

So we prayed.

And God moved our hearts from a hyper-focus on all the reasons it didn't make sense to an assurance that our small faith in a great God was enough to say yes, even when the answer didn't seem to make sense.

You know the rest of the story. It led to a tiny prayer room in a hospital in Taitung where we met a very ill eight month old who was discharged from the hospital into our care a couple days later, to fly to Taipei for her visa and then through San Francisco to land in Raleigh, meet her older siblings, and then head to see US doctors within hours of our arrival.

Jet lag, I'm certain you had those doctors thinking we were INSANE. Because we were, kind of.

But I like to think we're the best kind of crazy.

As a response to the doctor's condemning words and the heartbreaking reality that many families had said no before she crossed our paths, we chose a name for her that would speak truth: Zoe Amanda. Zoe means life, and Amanda means worthy of love, and really, truly, absolutely she is a life worthy of love.

What one doctor described as "horribly devastating" is one of the greatest blessings we have ever known. I don't have the time to list them every way she has improved our lives, but our days are richer, our faith is deeper, our mealtimes are funnier, our circle of framily is wider, and our world is better because we said yes to God when He led us to her.

I'm always caught off guard when people say that she's lucky. She's not, y'all. It's us.
We're the lucky ones. 

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

on the horizon (maybe) for Zoe

Update: On June 27, 2014, we got word that Zoe is indeed a good candidate for this surgery, so we'll be scheduling it soon and moving forward. Even though we have more answers now than when I wrote this, everything in this post still expresses our heart for our girl...

I need to start by making one fact perfectly clear: Zoe is loved exactly as she is, and nothing she might be able or unable to do in the future will change that.

That said, there's this surgery called selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) that could be a game changer for her if she's a good candidate. And as I write this, her packet of medical information is on the desk of some folks in St. Louis who will are responsible for the "if she's a good candidate" decision.

Cue the nerves.

I wasn't planning to write this post until we had an answer, but given that most people who have asked about Zoe lately have been treated to way more details about this than they were asking for, I figure it's time to put this out there.

Before I dive into the surgical details, let's start with the obvious question:
Why St. Louis when we live in North Carolina?

A few pediatric neurosurgeons in our state do this procedure, but none specialize in it and none have many years of experience with SDR, based on my research. SDR is a big deal, and I want a specialist and not just a hobbyist if my daughter is on the other side of their scalpel. The surgical team in St. Louis is world renowned: This is what they do, and they do it well.

Furthermore, most SDR surgeons wait until age 5 or older for the surgery, whereas the St. Louis team prefers for patients to be young, around age 2 to 4. At 2 years and 8 months old, Zoe's in the ideal range. They do plenty of SDRs on older, even adult, patients but they've found that orthopedic complications from cerebral palsy can be reduced if the procedure is done earlier in a child's development.

Finally, the St. Louis team is picky. They tell plenty of families, "No, your child is not the right fit for this." They do evaluate children without seeing them in person, but they require MRIs, hip and spine x-rays, videos of a couple dozen physical tasks from multiple angles, a physical therapist's evaluation, and a few extra bits of paperwork.

In other words, a lot of documentation... unless you've completed two international adoptions in the past two years, in which case this paperwork is NOTHING compared to the reams you've completed and had notarized, apostilled, translated, and shipped to the other side of the world.

Oh, and our insurance will cover it, even though it's not in our state, because (a) a doctor in the BCBS of NC network referred us and (b) the team in St. Louis is a BCBS provider for a different geographical area. We'll cover costs for travel, lodging, and our portion of post-surgery therapies (as physical therapy is limited in most insurance plans, including ours), but the bulk of the expenses will be covered.

So what's SDR?
First, let's define cerebral palsy. In CP, brain damage or under-development occurs in the womb or not long after birth. These abnormalities makes their brains communicate the wrong messages to muscle groups. For Zoe and many other kids, the result is spasticity: tight group of muscles that they have to fight against to make the movements the rest of us take for granted.

Remember the last time you had a charlie horse? You know, those annoying muscle cramps where your calf or another muscle gets really tight out of nowhere and it can hurt really bad? Well, that's life for Zoe, except she's usually just a little uncomfortable by her degree of tightness rather than being in that much pain.

In SDR, a patient's back is opened up to reveal the spinal cord, nerves are tested to determine which ones are contributing to muscle spasticity, and the ones that are the most severely causing spasticity are severed permanently. Here's all the details, if you're into that sort of thing.

Now you're grasping why we don't want just any doctor to do this for our girl...

In the right hands, this sort of surgery can dramatically improve the mobility potential for people like Zoe with severe spasticity. Sitting on her own without support, using her walker more than her wheelchair, becoming more independent in general... all of those are realistic outcomes for her if Zoe is able to have SDR.

So, for now, we wait to find out if she's a good candidate for it. 

If she is, we schedule it and figure out how we'll manage me and Zoe going to St. Louis for a month for the surgery, in-patient recovery, and out-patient rehab program, all while Lee and the other five probably stay put here in Raleigh.


I don't do that well.

I think that might be why God keeps giving me more and more opportunities to practice.

If the answer is yes, we'll praise God and figure out the logistics of what's next.

If the answer is no, we'll praise God and figure out the logistics of what's next.

Because whether this surgery is a good option for her or not, we love our Zoe girl no matter what.

Yes, that is her big brother helping her eat with a spoon at a family tea party, and yes, the picture is slightly blurry because I couldn't hold my hands steady as I melted at the preciousness of the moment. LOVE.

Monday, June 16, 2014

our summer schedule for schooling and sanity

Yep, school just ended last week, but my kids aren't getting a break.

Go ahead and call me cruel if you want. I don't care.

Jocelyn is right around grade level for reading and ahead in math, while Patience is behind in everything considering she only came to this country in November. To keep forward momentum for the girls as they head toward 2nd grade and to prepare the boys for kindergarten, we needed a plan.

Structure? Not my strong suit.

Good intentions? I'm all over those... while consistently inconsistent on my follow through.

So I took a note from a viral blog post I saw on Facebook, something about giving kids unlimited screen time after they've finished a list of tasks for the day. Cue our list...

Because our printer likes to pick her own colors, the actual page - which I printed and laminated and hung with 3M foam squares on the big girls' bunk beds - is in different colors, but I like the look.

My goals were to keep the girls reading and writing and working on math, while getting them to engage their siblings in reading, basic math, and phonemic awareness. I posted it on the last day of school and told the girls we would start the next day, so naturally they wanted to start that day.

Here's hoping they follow the plan this well every day!

Meanwhile, I just have to hold them accountable and pick out daily math pages for them to complete.

Low effort: that's my style.

I've already written about the magnets and zones (if you'd prefer not to click through, it's our chore system), so I think the only piece requiring explanation is the boxes. Most are made by a company called Lauri, and they're ready-made manipulatives for building early math and literacy. I think these pictures will show the finer details, but feel free to comment if you have any questions.

For Jocelyn, this will be a time for her to teach the brother she's working with that day. For Patience, she and her bro partner will be learning together for some of these.

Jocelyn and Patience are also reviewing spelling from 1st grade, using the 45 spelling lists they had last year; that happens during afternoon rest time (aka nap time for the little girls). In particular, we're focusing on vowel sounds for Patience, as those are the most challenging for English language learners, and going through three lists a week. I have a few workbooks we're also using from time to time, like cursive for Jocelyn and handwriting practice for the boys and reading comprehension for Patience.

Will this work? Eh, I don't know.

But it's a good plan to start with, and - with the exception of the week our oldest four will spend in day camp at New Life Camp - it'll work no matter what else is going on that week, even through VBS and a roadtrip to see some Alabama friends. Today marks our fifth day, given that the girls wanted to start on the last day of school and that I decided not to stop them when they decided the rules applied on weekends too (which wasn't my plan, but shh! don't tell them now), and all is going quite well.

Here's hoping for continued summer success! 
(And a lot of fun too... I'm not a total vacation killjoy, after all.)

Friday, June 13, 2014

HIV FAQ: Why did I do this series of posts?

For the final post in this series, I want to thank y'all and leave the door open for you...
I don't have any specific questions, but acknowledge my ignorance when it comes to HIV & am looking forward to reading your blogs. Thanks for educating me!
This series might be over, but I want to leave the door open. Please, keep the questions coming. Please, know that we are approachable. Please, understand that we will only be hurt or offended if you come to us with rejection before you've ever asked a single question about HIV.

One of my favorite moments in this journey was when a friend at church pulled me aside before Bible study, concerned about her daughter's busted lip. She didn't know which of our children has HIV, and she knew one of our kids was in the same class as hers. She told me about the situation and then said, "So I can't put a bandaid or anything on it, because it's her lip, but it's a wound, so is there anything I need to know to keep her safe from HIV with an open wound?"

I love so many things about this.

First, I love that she was comfortable talking to me about it. Second, I love the opportunity it gave me to explain that childhood boo-boos have never transmitted HIV. And third, we hugged and moved on, like two moms who were discussing any typical childhood concern for their kids.

I bet she doesn't even know that I cried later, so grateful for such a sweet and positive encounter.

We want to keep educating, so please, please, please let us do that.

Many of you know that the Today show featured an online article on HIV discrimination featuring our family. Here's an update: those friends have read what we've shared and done their own research, and now? They're not afraid of HIV anymore. We're moving toward that happy ending that we hoped for.

God is truth, and God is love. And? "There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear." (1 John 4:18)

That's why we lovingly share truth about HIV.

Thursday, June 12, 2014

HIV FAQ: What about when your child is old enough for dating and sex?

Oh, goodness. This is a topic I think about a lot, but I'm nearly breaking out in hives at the thought of blogging about it, because (a) SEX! and (b) MY CHILDREN ARE ALL AGE SEVEN AND YOUNGER, FOR THE LOVE!

But these questions are totally valid and might be helpful to some readers, so here goes...
This is in the way future, but how will you handle discussions about sex? What will be the same and what will be different?  
What do you plan to teach your child about dating relationships? Like, when should they disclose? Up front or after some time?
How will you address HIV as your child grows and possibly becomes sexually active? That can also be an age of children rebelling against parental advice. My child is HIV+, but she is an adult. I know you know her story: Please feel free to share her blog with your readers. Now going into our third year living with HIV, we barely think of it after the horror of our first reaction to hearing that diagnosis. Life is just normal now.  
How do you educate the HIV+ child about protecting others from infection? (ie informing a school nurse or friend's parent if they skin their knee and need bandaging)  
First, to answer that last question, HIV isn't transmitted via skinned knees, so you might want to read this post: How do we keep other kids from catching HIV? But I included the question because issues of dating and sex are all about protecting others from infection.

Honestly, I can't answer most of these questions. Not because I haven't thought about it, because I have. OH, HAVE I! But I know from friends further along in this parenting journey that "the talk" with each child is different, depending on age, personality, and maturity.

When it comes to the stage in relationship that disclosure should happen, that's not a decision we'll make for our child. We'll talk about it, but that's a personal decision and not one Mom or Dad can make.

As with any parenting stage, we'll draw from resources available to us, including the AMAZING folks we have in Duke's pediatric infectious disease team. One is a social worker whose job includes helping us navigate these challenging topics. I expect that Rachel and I will have many conversations about sex and HIV in the future.

Finally, I'm optimistic that more and more medical advances will be made before our child is ready to be sexually active. That's the biggest reason why I can't answer how we'll talk about it then, because I simply don't know what the facts will be then. Already in the six months since we've been home from Uganda, new advances include:

All of those advancements were reported in 2014. We are hopeful that this trend will continue so that, perhaps, our dating and sex talks with our child who has HIV will be no different because of how far modern medicine has brought us by then. 

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

HIV FAQ: How do we explain HIV to our child who is positive and our other children?

Is your child aware they are HIV+?
How do you approach the topic of HIV with your child, especially as they get older?
I am not sure how old your child with HIV is but we are waiting to go to court to adopt [a child who is 15]. We have not talked to her yet about her illness and we are worried about that conversation. How she feels about it? Is she scared? Does she want to talk about it at all!! How did you do this? 
How do you plan to equip your positive child to face the world unashamed?  
Yes, my child is aware, as much as he/she can be at this age.

In Uganda, HIV was already a familiar term. Whenever we went to the doctor there, it was explicitly called "the HIV clinic" there. Our kids knew that HIV was the reason others in their family and community had died.

Did they understand what HIV was? No, not really. But no kid really can.

Early on, our biggest priority was explaining that the medication our child takes daily would lead to life. Our kids had the impression that HIV = death so we had to re-write that story for them to dispel fear.

As far as other conversations go, all six of our children are 7 and younger, so we talk about how one has booboos on the brain (cerebral palsy) that she needs therapies and other helps for and another has booboos in the blood that require daily medicine. In Uganda, HIV was talked about openly, so they had been exposed to the term, and the head of infectious disease at Duke (where we go) recommends talking about HIV from an early age and adding more details over time. For now, we talk about how the medicine keeps the booboos from making our child feel sick, and the booboos can't make anyone else sick unless they share blood or private parts.

When it comes to helping our child live unashamed, that's part of why we chose to disclose about HIV instead of keeping it a secret. I feel like it's hard - but not impossible - to tell a child, "this is nothing to be ashamed of, but don't dare tell anyone."

More than that, though, we teach all of our children that differences are important. Differences - in health or ability or appearance or anything else - make the world richer, and different. does. not. mean. less than. 

Finally, we are clear that HIV does not define us. Our child is SO MUCH MORE than HIV, and that's a lesson we'll be teaching and re-teaching all through our parenting journey.

And tomorrow? Sex and dating and HIV... oh my!

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

HIV FAQ: Why do you disclose that your child is HIV+?

Before I dive into this round of questions, let me be clear that disclosure is an personal family decision. I'll answer these questions for us, but other families I know and love have chosen a different way. 
We are adopting a child that has Hepatitis B and there are some similarities between HepB and HIV. The biggest piece of advice we've been given by doctors and other HepB parents is to not disclose our child's condition with others in our day-to-day lives (excluding immediate family). This has been a struggle because we are usually such an open book and our friends/family all know we are doing a special-need adoption and we are repeatedly asked what the special need is. I'm just curious what made you and your husband decide to share this? Not condemning your choice at all! We are not at all ashamed or embarrassed by our daughter's illness, but we are also passionate about protecting her privacy so she does not suffer discrimination or prejudice because we decided to make it public. Can you explain your reasoning for choosing otherwise? Thanks and God bless!!!
From a family adopting a positive child: We have only disclosed to our family because we feel it is her story to tell. We don't want to make that decision for her. Did you disclose? How was it received? thank you for your wisdom!!! 
The privacy vs. advocacy dilemma is a hard one for any parenting topic: how do we help make the world a safe place for our children to live unashamed while respecting their privacy to share their stories when and where and to what extent they decide?

I don't think there's one universally right answer, except PROCEED WITH CAUTION.

For us, that means only publicly sharing that one of our children is HIV+. A few close friends know, but it's not common knowledge beyond that. Most people who adopt a positive child, though, don't have the option w did of only partially disclosing. It was only because we adopted three siblings at once, with only one having HIV (which, side note, fits the stats pretty well - for a woman with untreated HIV, there's a 25-30% chance that she'll pass HIV on to her child in pregnancy), and I'm not sure what we would have done about disclosure had we only been adopting one positive child.

As far as medical professionals go, we've gotten different advice from different nurses, doctors, and specialists. To me, what it comes down to is this: disclosure isn't a medical decision; it's a parenting decision. When the medical professionals we work with for our children's health or for my health offer research-driven, medically-proven direction, we follow it. When they offer opinions about how my husband and I ought to parent our children, we consider their advice but certainly don't feel bound to it in the same way we treat their dosing instructions for prescriptions.

For us, we've seen three great benefits to disclosure (once again, for OUR family, whereas I know many non-disclosing families who could offer a similar list of benefits they've observed from NOT disclosing):
  1. We are able to educate others, in hopes that the world might be a little less ignorant once our child is gaining independence. We have experienced rejection, and some of those who rejected us and our child have changed their minds and hearts since. (Oh, and if you only knew the rejoicing when we found out!) That's huge, y'all. Furthermore, we have dozens upon dozens of other friends who didn't reject us but instead came to us with questions and concerns so they could be comfortable, plus two friends who have begun the adoption process planning to add an HIV+ child to their family because they've seen how it works for us. Once again, HUGE. 
  2. We haven't shouldered our children with secrecy. I can't share all the specifics of how we know this directly and deeply, but our experience and research tells us that secrecy usually shrouds unpleasant and even criminal situations, such as abuse or untreated addictions. Given our past observations - professionally and personally - of secrecy in childhood, we didn't personally feel comfortable encouraging secrecy. Also? Our kids are oversharers (hmm, I wonder where they get that from...) and young, so the concept of privacy can be hard to grasp at their age, whereas it would be perfectly appropriate for other ages. For now with their ages and personalities, "don't talk about HIV" would be heard as "TELL EVERYONE YOU KNOW ABOUT HIV!" (Side note: for us, not telling our children about HIV wasn't an option, because the topic had already been discussed in detail with our newest three, who in turn talked about it in detail to our first three, so while some parents can just say, "Little Johnny takes medicine," without explaining why, that wasn't an available choice for us.)
  3. We have shielded our child from feeling rejection from someone who doesn't know and then finds out and then doesn't let their child play with ours anymore. Sadly, when that happened in one friendship, I couldn't shield Jocelyn and Robbie from asking why we didn't play with _________ anymore, but I also didn't tell them the reason out of hope of restoring that relationship in time. For our newest three, we didn't want them to start to build an attachment with someone new only to have that stripped away like so many previous attachments in their tender lives.
I've written about disclosure and our decisions about it before, so I'll just end by sharing those links to three previous posts and one Today show article in which our family was featured, all of which address this topic in depth:

I know I've said this already, but it's worth mentioning again: This is the RIGHT decision for OUR family, whereas non-disclosure is the right choice for others. Please don't feel like this is the only valid path for those of us parenting children with HIV or other blood-borne pathogens. It's like breastfeeding vs. formula, cloth diapers vs. disposable, and so on... to each his or her own.

Monday, June 9, 2014

HIV FAQ: How does your child's life compare to other kids? #medicalcare #ARVs #dailylife

I bet y'all thought I had forgotten about this series of posts, huh? Nope. Now back to it...
What is the life expectancy for a child with HIV?
How often does your child go to the doctor? How many medications is your child on? Will they be on the same medications/amounts for the rest of their lives or will the types of medicines and dosages change as they grow and change?
Are you going broke on the cost of meds? 
What is the extent of medical care that is involved in adopting a child with HIV?
What does daily life look like? 

Our lives are pretty normal. As much as this series might make it seem, HIV really isn't a big part of who we are as a family.

Yes, our child takes an ARV (anti retro-viral) regimen of three drugs, two twice a day and one once a day. I know other kids who only have meds once a day, and that might be the eventual reality for us, but it's every 12 hours for us: 7:30am and 7:30pm. In case we're out late, we keep one evening dose in a bottle in the van. For the medication to work well and for our child not to develop a resistance to one of the drugs, we have to stick to the clock well. The importance of that was driven home by a recent study that kids with HIV are more likely to develop drug resistances than adults with HIV; that resistance is then life-long and limits the treatment options into adulthood.

Side note: let's all thank God for my husband, who is the responsible member of our marriage and the designated family medication manager.

Some of the specific medications and doses will change with age and with weight, and we're hopeful that advancements in modern medicine might offer even better options in the future. For now, we see our pediatric infectious disease team at Duke every 4 months, but eventually it will be every 6 months.

Truly, they are a delightful bunch, and we love seeing them each time. 

As for the cost, let's first take a step back to talk about insurance coverage for adopted children. When you adopt a child, it is like giving birth, as far as traditional insurance companies in the USA are concerned. In other words, pre-existing conditions don't exist.

(Side note: The one major exception to this is MediShare, which presents itself as a Christian alternative to medical insurance in which members share medical costs. MediShare, by vote of their membership, does NOT cover pre-existing conditions for children who are adopted, while all secular insurance plans do. I could write a whole 'nother post about my feelings on that, but maybe another time...)

In other words, the cost has to do with what the cost of any other prescription meds would be under your family's insurance plan. Assistance programs are available through each state and through major pharmaceutical companies, but we are a-okay with just our insurance. For us, we have a high deductible plan in which prescription medications and most other medical costs are covered 100% after the deductible is met, and given my medical costs alone for rheumatoid arthritis drugs, our family meets that deductible every year. So while our monthly premiums increased a bit with the addition of three more dependents when we adopted our Ugandan darlings, our medical costs remained unchanged otherwise.

And life expectancy? HIV+ individuals being treated with ARVs live nearly as long as people who don't have HIV, with a life expectancy of 70+. Something will eventually end our child's life, but it won't be HIV or AIDS.

In short, staying on meds makes for a pretty normal life, despite HIV.

Sunday, June 1, 2014

speaking love to her, in the language of flat twists

When I blogged about Patience's yarn twists, she didn't yet have enough hair for any other style. She barely had enough, as it was, to anchor the yarn.

Extensions have never been our end goal for her, though. On Facebook back in April (side note: it's June? how'd that happen?!?), I shared this:

She's been rocking a short 'do ever since.

And I'm not ashamed to admit that I shed a few tears when a friend from church brought this to me the next week. 

Yep, that's my fridge: a little Patu in a church craft frame, a little Lupita collage, and some dinos and a fish to hold it all up.

One morning shortly after we removed the yarn, she looked at herself in the mirror, paused, and then proclaimed, "Mama, I look fabulous."

And she does.

Thanks again to the power of youTube (video at the end), I decided to try some flat twists with their own hair, sans yarn. Flat twists are kind of like cornrows, with the main difference that the hair is twisted rather than braided. 

I attempted some cornrows the other day, and let's just let the lack of post or pictures speak for itself.

Yeah. Mama needs some more practice on that. 

After that, Patience wasn't interested in being my guinea pig, so this time I started with Patu. One twist in on her sister, I heard, "Mama, will you do mine next?" She loves her TWA - that's "teeny weeny afro" in black hair lingo - so she just wanted a couple flat twists in the front.

The butterfly barrettes aren't a must as the twists stay in on their own, but she likes the pop of color.

As I shared last time, hair isn't just hair for Patience. 

Really, it's not for any black woman, but that's a whole 'nother post. While this white mama can't fully understand all those ins and outs, I trust my black friends and take their word for something I might never fully comprehend.

But as the daughter of a hairdresser - not me, her first mother - she learned that part of a mama's love was hair time. But me? I'm super white, if you haven't noticed. So committing to her meant committing to learning a whole new hair language.

Because? It's her love language.

The style on Patu is a little more rough, as I started with her first and as her soft looser curls don't lend themselves to twisting as much as Patience's tight coarser spirals do. 

And? I need some more work on parts, especially in her hair... but grace, y'all. Because have I mentioned that I'm white and I'm learning?

Oh my gracious! I could just eat her up with a spoon.

As I learn, sometimes I have to borrow some confidence from this lovely lady:

Because she's growing into an amazing young lady with plenty of confidence to spare. As she told me tonight as I was getting started on her hair, "Don't worry, Mommy. You've got this."


As promised, here's the tutorial I used to learn the technique. 

Wednesday, May 21, 2014

5 reasons why I'm not interested in seeing Mom's Night Out

1. I'm not much of a movie-goer anyway.

Seriously, as a freshman in high school, my midterm for my acting class was to write a review of a movie I had seen in the theaters that semester... and my mom and I had to go to the movies that night because I hadn't seen any. Lee and I have been married for nearly nine years, and we've seen less than one movie in theaters each year (and that's including Tangled and The Lorax with kids).

Why would I go and sit uncomfortably close to strangers in a dark place with a too-loud soundtrack and icky sticky floors when I can wait to watch it in my own home? I just don't get it.

That said, I do look forward to many Netflix releases, so my theater-phobia isn't my only reason to not be interested in this one.

2. Pro-motherhood messages are great, but not at the expense of bashing fathers.

I'm all for the affirmation of stay-at-home moms and motherhood in general, but not if it requires bashing husbands/daddies in the process. For starters, here's the blurb describing the movie:
All Allyson and her friends want is a peaceful, grown-up evening of dinner and conversation . . . a long-needed moms’ night out. But in order to enjoy high heels, adult conversation and food not served in a paper bag, they need their husbands to watch the kids for three hours—what could go wrong?
Let's see, just from the trailer: one dad whines when he hears his wife is going out. one dad leaves the baby with someone unreliable and then it seems that part of the movie is spent finding said baby. the dads go together to a place where the kids can get their hands stamped and be trapped from leaving because the idea of parenting without some exterior back-up is too much. one dad calls his wife to tell her, in a bumblingly foolish way, that he's headed to the ER. two dads are saran-wrapped together at one point. oh, and another guy - not a dad - is a cop who accidentally shoots one of the moms with a stun gun.

All that combines to say this: Women, the fathers of our children are buffoons. You ought to be celebrated, because guys are such morons they could never do your job.

And to be honest, I'm offended by that. My husband gladly mans the house without me so I can do a good number of things outside of our home. I go to book club every other week, travel for speaking engagements every couple months, have coffee with a friend one or two evenings a month, and an evening meeting here or there. I've yet to take all six kids to the grocery store, while he's done it a half dozen times. I was down and out with a stomach bug on the day we'd scheduled all six kids to go to the dentist - many for the first time ever - and he didn't cancel; no, he stepped up and did it.

And? I know a lot of other amazing dads in our circle of friends, so I'm not buying into the "but a lot of dads are like that" excuse for belittling fathers.

One reviewer penned, "Usually I despise the whole sitcom dad-incompetence we see over and over again. I really do miss the Bill Cosby style of father. But in Moms’ Night Out, the incompetence was integral to the goal of the plot." Um, and how does that make it okay? I'm just not seeing it.

3. I don't buy the hype that it's my Christian responsibility to support a Christian film.

What is a "Christian" film anyway? Last I checked, films don't make professions of faith any more than musics or clothing or jewelry or any other inanimate object does.

Sure, it's PG. Sure, I hear there's the cliche Christian film altar call embedded in there. Sure, there's a pastor's wife and a young Christian stay-at-home mom.

But I still - even if I didn't feel like it presented an unbiblical representation of responsible fatherhood - don't have to support it any more than I need to feel more inclined to use a Christian plumber just because he's a Christian. Sure, I'm all for throwing business toward someone in my faith, but you know what? I'm primarily concerned with whether or not he's a good plumber.

Same goes for movies. I don't have an obligation to support something just because it's made by Christians with some Christian messages throughout. Is it a good movie? That's what I care about.

And please, before you boast that it's lacking all the objectionable things of other films, like profanity and nudity and sexual innuendo, backtrack to my second point where I make it clear that I find it plenty objectionable to portray dads as fools.

4. I have four girls, and I hope some or all of them become mothers.

And I hope they marry men who, like their Daddy, man up when it comes to being a father and flinch when people dare to say they're "babysitting" when mom leaves the house for a bit. No, as Lee is quick to point out, that's called BEING A DAD.

I want my girls (and boys) to know that they don't have to bash one thing in order to show merit in another.

5. I have two boys, who I expect will be fathers one day.

And I hope I never reinforce the world's poor image of fatherhood in my desire to show them the importance of motherhood.

I know many of you have seen the film and raved about, and that's fine. Truly. My sensitivity to this might be higher than yours, while your sensitivity to other issues in other films or TV shows is probably higher than mine. To each his or her own.

But after seeing approximately one million posts telling me that I MUST SEE THIS MOVIE, I wanted to take a moment to explain why I'm passing on this one.

Because this guy and so many others ROCK at being a dad and not just a punchline.